Author
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to present a comprehensive analysis of multidimensional poverty in Uttar Pradesh, revealing specific deprivation faced by various social and religious groups. It identifies poverty risks and changes in deprivations to assess inter-group disparities among social and religious groups, offering insights for targeted policies. Design/methodology/approach - The study uses the updated and harmonised global multidimensional poverty index methodology, using unit-level records from past three National Family Health Surveys conducted between 2005–2006 and 2019–2021. This study used multivariate regression analysis to examine how social, religious, household and regional factors interact to influence deprivation. Findings - Scheduled castes and Muslims face disproportionately high poverty levels and intense deprivations, surpassing their population shares significantly. Inter-group poverty differences are narrowing, but Muslims experience slower improvement. Rural–urban poverty disparities persist, notably among less disadvantageous groups. Deprivational challenges persist in education-related indicators, undernutrition, sanitation, cooking fuel and housing. Scheduled castes experience significant deprivation across all ten indicators, while both Hindus and Muslims are highly deprived in housing and cooking fuel indicators. Muslims face persistent educational challenges. Marginalised groups (SCs, Muslims), larger households, households living in rural areas and female-headed households experience higher deprivation; non-nuclear families and bank account access are associated with lower deprivation. Originality/value - In addressing Uttar Pradesh’s significant role in global poverty, this study fills a vital gap in the literature. As the state pursues social and economic progress, the findings of the study will provide a roadmap for a more equitable future.
Suggested Citation
Akarsh Arora & S.P. Singh, 2025.
"Multidimensional poverty at the epicentre: analysing socio-religious disparities in Uttar Pradesh, India,"
Indian Growth and Development Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 112-131, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:igdrpp:igdr-02-2024-0021
DOI: 10.1108/IGDR-02-2024-0021
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:igdrpp:igdr-02-2024-0021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.