IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ferpps/fer-03-2026-0015.html

Public preferences for fundamental, ecological and cultural services of national park gateway communities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Dian Jin
  • Xuemei Jiang

Abstract

PurposeGateway communities are powerful assistance for national parks. By providing fundamental, ecological and cultural services, they effectively promote their own development, the parks’ comprehensive functions and public welfare.Design/methodology/approachThis study first employs the ABCDE psychological model to reveal how nature-based experiences influence public pro-environmental awareness and behaviors. To better improve nature-based experiences in gateway communities, this study further employs a choice experiment. It is used to explore the public preferences for specific services in gateway communities.Findings(1) High-quality nature-based experiences enhance public pro-environmental awareness and behaviors. (2) Public preferences are hierarchical for gateway community services, particularly for ecological services, followed by cultural services and finally fundamental services. (3) Public preferences are heterogeneous for ecological and cultural services. Travelers seeking relaxation or companionship with friends prefer ecological services, whereas those with more leisure time, staying accommodated in gateway communities, traveling for entertainment or traveling with elders’ value cultural services more. (4) Moreover, the public can be categorized into experience-focused, environment-focused and price-focused groups.Originality/valueAccordingly, this study proposes to prioritize ecological services and innovate cultural services in gateway communities. It also recommends three types of communities with distinctive functions for different groups. These findings offer empirical insights for the man–land relationship and sustainability of national parks and other protected areas worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian Jin & Xuemei Jiang, 2026. "Public preferences for fundamental, ecological and cultural services of national park gateway communities in China," Forestry Economics Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 98-116, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ferpps:fer-03-2026-0015
    DOI: 10.1108/FER-03-2026-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/fer/article/8/1/98/1370273/Public-preferences-for-fundamental-ecological-and
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/fer/article-pdf/8/1/98/11661636/fer-03-2026-0015en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/FER-03-2026-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ferpps:fer-03-2026-0015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.