Author
Listed:
- Changyou Sun
- Bin Mei
- Yanshu Li
Abstract
PurposeThe objective of this study was to provide an empirical analysis of judicial resolution of disputes over restrictions imposed by conservation easements in the United States of America (USA). We examined the patterns in published cases regarding the interpretation, enforcement, and durability of perpetual restrictions at the intersection of contract and property law.Design/methodology/approachWe conducted a systematic content analysis of 191 published judicial decisions issued between 1975 and 2025 across 40 states. Content analysis was customized to code this cohort of cases, and we identified patterns in legal issues, party participation, judicial reasoning, jurisdictional distribution and litigation outcomes.FindingsConservation easement litigation was predominantly state-centered, increased substantially after 2005, and was concentrated at the appellate level. Although landowners most frequently initiated disputes, courts consistently ruled in favor of easement holders and government agencies in preserving and enforcing easement restrictions. Most cases involved the interpretation and enforcement of existing easements, particularly in the context of development pressures affecting undeveloped land subject to perpetual restrictions. While relatively infrequent, takings claims constituted a notable exception to the presumed permanence of easements.Originality/valueThis study provides the most comprehensive empirical analysis of conservation easement litigation in the United States to date. By systematically examining five decades of judicial decisions, it clarifies how courts apply legal doctrines in resolving easement disputes and identifies implications for legal drafting, stewardship practices and the design of long-term conservation policy.
Suggested Citation
Changyou Sun & Bin Mei & Yanshu Li, 2026.
"Conservation easement restrictions and enforcement: evidence from US judicial opinions,"
Forestry Economics Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 172-192, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ferpps:fer-02-2026-0008
DOI: 10.1108/FER-02-2026-0008
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ferpps:fer-02-2026-0008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.