Author
Listed:
- Antonia Girardi
- Geoffrey N. Soutar
- Steven Ward
Abstract
Purpose - To validate a measure of use innovativeness, or how existing products are used in a novel and innovative manner. The measure has practical significance for innovation research as it consists of only nine items as opposed to the original 44. The use innovativeness measure derived from research predicts acceptance of new technology (in this case computer technology) and could be adapted to other fields of innovation research. Design/methodology/approach - A survey was conducted and structural equation modelling techniques were used to analyse the data. Findings - Evidence for a unidimensional measure of use innovativeness is provided by structural equation modelling. The nine‐item measure has fewer items than the original 44‐item measure developed by Price and Ridgway (1983) Price and Ridgway and consists of the items of multiple use and creative reuse. The measure was found to be positively correlated with innovativeness and opinion leadership and the acceptance of new information technology. The construct of use innovativeness is thus a practical measurement for use in innovation research. Research limitations/implications - Some limitations regarding the nature of the sample are discussed. Implications for future research in the diffusion of innovations are also addressed. Originality/value - The only paper which validates a measure of use innovativeness, so that it has practical and theoretical use in innovation practice and research.
Suggested Citation
Antonia Girardi & Geoffrey N. Soutar & Steven Ward, 2005.
"The validation of a use innovativeness scale,"
European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 471-481, December.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ejimpp:14601060510627830
DOI: 10.1108/14601060510627830
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ejimpp:14601060510627830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.