IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ebhrmp/ebhrm-07-2018-0045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Total rewards to enhance employees’ intention to stay: does perception of justice play any role?

Author

Listed:
  • Alka Rai
  • Piyali Ghosh
  • Tanusree Dutta

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore how total rewards might influence intention to stay among employees of private sector banks in India. A moderated-mediation mechanism is hypothesized, in which a system of total rewards leads to intention to stay via engagement and organizational justice (OJ) moderates the linkage of total rewards with engagement. Design/methodology/approach - Perception of employees about the constructs considered has been assessed by a survey, using a structured questionnaire. Employees of private banks located in the State of Uttar Pradesh were the population for this study. A total of 17 branches of 7 private banks were covered, and the number of valid responses was 761. Hypotheses testing has been done with SPSS PROCESS command. Findings - Hypotheses proposing mediation (engagement as mediator between total rewards and intention to stay), moderation (OJ as moderator between total rewards and engagement) and moderated mediation have found support. Practical implications - Results obtained direct us to infer that in addition to the amount or value of any reward, aspects of OJ, such as equity and fairness in allocation of such reward and transparency in the procedure followed, are likely to influence the effectiveness of total rewards practices in engaging employees and motivating them to stay with their present employer. Originality/value - This study adds to total rewards literature by highlighting how a total rewards system can lead to engagement, and consequently to employees’ intention to stay. Results establish OJ as an important attribute to any total rewards package to make the latter more valuable and effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Alka Rai & Piyali Ghosh & Tanusree Dutta, 2019. "Total rewards to enhance employees’ intention to stay: does perception of justice play any role?," Evidence-based HRM, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 262-280, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-07-2018-0045
    DOI: 10.1108/EBHRM-07-2018-0045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EBHRM-07-2018-0045/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EBHRM-07-2018-0045/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/EBHRM-07-2018-0045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vakili Atena Mirhosseini & Salajegheh Sanjar & Sayadi Saeed & Pourkiani Masoud, 2022. "Rewards from the Perspective of Employees and Managers," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 31-38, March.
    2. Tzu-Chun Weng & Yun-Hsuan Shen & Te-Tzu Kan, 2023. "Talent Sustainability and Development: How Talent Management Affects Employees’ Intention to Stay through Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support with the Moderating Role of Work–Life Bal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-07-2018-0045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.