Author
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between ownership concentration and company performance in China private listed companies. Design/methodology/approach - – By taking into account of the difference of managerial positions of large shareholders in listed companies (whether they assume the posts as presidents or general managers), and based on the two agency theories, the paper analyzes the state dependency of the relationship between ownership concentration and the company performance of listed companies with the samples of China private listed companies from 2003 to 2011. Findings - – The paper finds that if the large shareholders assume no posts in the listed companies, there is an invertedUshape relation between shareholding ratio of the largest shareholders and the company performance. This result indicates the inadequate or excessive monitoring to the companies by the large shareholders according to different shareholding ratios. If large shareholders assume posts in the listed companies, there is aUshape relation between shareholding ratio of the largest shareholders and the company performance. This result indicates the tunneling and propping to the small shareholders by the large shareholders according to different shareholding ratios. Research limitations/implications - – This paper has not taken the influence of earnings management of the listed companies. Practical implications - – For strengthening the protection of investors, proper distinction shall be made among shareholders of different conditions, and difference of roles large shareholders play in the company under different conditions shall be understood correctly, so as to formulate and perfect market rules for corporate governance, rather than just restraining the power (rights) of large shareholders. The study in this paper is for helping understand the different roles large shareholders play under different corporate governance conditions. Originality/value - – First, different from the research paradigm of relationship between ownership concentration and company performance in existing literature, the paper discriminates the study background with the post-assuming conditions of large shareholders in listed companies and believes that relationship between ownership concentration and company performance shall be presented differently under different post-assuming conditions. Second, by using monitoring theory and tunneling and propping theory to explain the behaviors of large shareholders under different post-assuming conditions respectively, a new theory explanation view is provided for explaining the relation between ownership concentration and company performance.
Suggested Citation
Xiaobao Song, 2015.
"Monitoring or tunneling by large shareholders: evidence from China private listed companies,"
China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 187-211, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:cfripp:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:187-211
DOI: 10.1108/CFRI-09-2014-0071
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ping Sun & Sheng Ma & Xinxin Xu, 2022.
"Multi-Factor Collaborative Governance of Controlling Shareholder Expropriation Behavior in Emerging Economies: A Perspective of Double Principal-Agent Conflicts,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
- Xiaobao SONG & Wunhong SU, 2022.
"Heterogeneous Debt Financing and Share Return Volatility,"
Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 85-105, April.
- Xiaobao Song & Wun-Hong Su & Yuqing Liu, 2019.
"The Impact of the Supervisory Board Supervision on Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms,"
Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 16, pages 47-58, May.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
- G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:cfripp:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:187-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.