Author
Listed:
- Nik Nazli Nik Ahmad
- Maliah Sulaiman
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to explore accounting students' perceived usefulness of case studies in Malaysia, which has a more passive learning environment, and if gender, prior academic performance and prior exposure to case studies influenced students' perceptions. Design/methodology/approach - – A questionnaire survey on students' perceived usefulness of case studies based on Weilet al.was used with final-year students enrolled in an advanced management accounting course. The data were gathered over two semesters in 2006/2007. Findings - – Findings reveal that generally students felt that the case method was very useful and gave them numerous benefits. However, there were no significant differences in the perceived usefulness of case studies across gender and prior academic performance. Some differences were observed between students with prior exposure to case studies and students without such exposure, in that students without prior exposure perceived higher benefits of case studies. Research limitations/implications - – The study showed that students in a passive learning environment generally find case studies to be very beneficial. Practical implications - – The case approach should be used more extensively and introduced earlier in accounting undergraduate programmes. Originality/value - – This study is one of very few studies which have investigated students' perceived usefulness of case studies, in a developing country, Malaysia, where a more passive learning environment exists – addressing an important gap in the accounting education literature.
Suggested Citation
Nik Nazli Nik Ahmad & Maliah Sulaiman, 2013.
"Case studies in a passive learning environment: some Malaysian evidence,"
Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(3), pages 173-196, November.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:arjpps:v:26:y:2013:i:3:p:173-196
DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-10-2012-0082
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:arjpps:v:26:y:2013:i:3:p:173-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.