IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/arapps/ara-08-2022-0202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the rhetoric art in sustainability reports obstruct the assurance practice?

Author

Listed:
  • Yosra Mnif
  • Jihene Kchaou

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the relationship between the readability of sustainability reports and assurance provider effort, captured by assurance delay and the moderating effect of the assurance provider. Design/methodology/approach - This sample consists of companies operating in sustainability sensitive industries from 39 countries for the period that covers the years 2016–2018. Findings - The results show that poor sustainability reporting readability is associated with longer assurance delays. Indeed, assurance providers spend more effort assuring clients when sustainability reports are less readable, as shown by long assurance delay. In addition, increases in assurance delay associated with poor sustainability reporting readability are driven by accounting assurance providers. These results hold after controlling for endogeneity using Heckman's (1979) analysis and other measures of assurance delay readability used in prior literature. By checking the specialization of assurance provider partners and setting aside dominant countries, the authors provide insight into the impact of assurance provider specialization on the association between sustainability report readability and assurance provider effort measured by assurance delay and thus, lending further confidence to the strength of the study’s main findings. Research limitations/implications - This research provides preliminary evidence on the relationship between sustainability reporting readability and assurance delay as well as the influence of accounting assurance providers. Practical implications - Sustainability assurance practice is viewed as a tool to add or enhance credibility. This study could be considered as another step into driving the standardization of sustainability reporting practice internationally. Originality/value - This is the first investigation conducted in the sustainability literature on the assurance provider's response to the readability of sustainability reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Yosra Mnif & Jihene Kchaou, 2023. "Does the rhetoric art in sustainability reports obstruct the assurance practice?," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 712-732, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:arapps:ara-08-2022-0202
    DOI: 10.1108/ARA-08-2022-0202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARA-08-2022-0202/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARA-08-2022-0202/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/ARA-08-2022-0202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:arapps:ara-08-2022-0202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.