IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/afrpps/v72y2012i3p471-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging weather risk on aggregated and individual farm-level: Pitfalls of aggregation biases on the evaluation of weather index-based insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Leif Erec Heimfarth
  • Robert Finger
  • Oliver Musshoff

Abstract

Purpose - Since the 1990s, there has been a discussion about the use of weather index-based insurance, also called weather derivatives, as a new instrument to hedge against volumetric risks in agriculture. It particularly differs from other insurance schemes by pay-offs being related to objectively measurable weather variables. Due to the absence of individual farm yield time series, the hedging effectiveness of weather index-based insurance is often estimated on the basis of aggregated farm data. The authors expect that there are differences in the hedging effectiveness of insurance on the aggregated level and on the individual farm-level. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the magnitude of bias which occurs if the hedging effectiveness of weather index-based insurance is estimated on aggregated yield data. Design/methodology/approach - The study is based on yield time series from individual farms in central Germany and weather data provided by the German Meteorological Service. Insurance is structured as put-option on a cumulated precipitation index. The analysis includes the estimation of the hedging effectiveness of insurance on aggregated level and on individual farm-level. The hedging effectiveness is measured non-parametrically regarding the relative reduction of the standard deviation and the value at risk of wheat revenues. Findings - Findings indicate that the hedging effectiveness of a weather index-based insurance estimated on aggregated level is considerably higher than the realizable hedging effectiveness on the individual farm-level. This refers to: hedging effectiveness estimated on the aggregated level is higher than the mean of realized hedging effectiveness on the individual farm-level and almost every evaluated individual farm in the analysis realizes a lower hedging effectiveness than estimated on the aggregated level of the study area. Nevertheless, weather index-based insurance designed on the aggregated level can lead to a notable risk reduction for individual farms. Originality/value - To the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first that analyzes the influence of crop yield aggregation with regard to the hedging effectiveness of weather index-based insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Leif Erec Heimfarth & Robert Finger & Oliver Musshoff, 2012. "Hedging weather risk on aggregated and individual farm-level: Pitfalls of aggregation biases on the evaluation of weather index-based insurance," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 72(3), pages 471-487, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:72:y:2012:i:3:p:471-487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00021461211277295?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:72:y:2012:i:3:p:471-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: http://www.emeraldinsight.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.