IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/aaajpp/aaaj-06-2023-6491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational NGO accountability and the legacy of post-colonial mistrust

Author

Listed:
  • Anees Farrukh
  • Rania Kamla

Abstract

Purpose - We explore how trust/mistrust, embedded within conditions of postcoloniality, is constituted in educational NGOs’ (ENGOs) accountability practices and relationships. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative design involving interviews with local educational ENGOs’ agents in Pakistan and document analysis of educational policy in Pakistan. Findings - Our findings demonstrate how mistrust, rooted in colonial legacy and postcolonial conditions, is constituted in accountability practices and relations in ENGOs in Pakistan. The externally imposed, one-dimensional, accounting-based accountability relations dominate ENGOs. Such accountability relations neither build trust between funders, local ENGOs agents and the community nor empower ENGOs to achieve their educational emancipatory mission. Meanwhile, mistrust can occasionally drive local actors to find an alternative to foreign funding, shifting accountability towards beneficiaries as a form of anti-colonial resistance, seemingly improving education delivery and enhancing community trust. Originality/value - The study contributes theoretically and empirically by opening the literature on NGO accountability to post-colonial theoretical explanations around mistrust, and by critically examining accountability processes, needs and perspectives from the vantage point of the post-colonised nations of the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Anees Farrukh & Rania Kamla, 2025. "Educational NGO accountability and the legacy of post-colonial mistrust," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 1233-1263, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-06-2023-6491
    DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2023-6491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2023-6491/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2023-6491/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2023-6491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-06-2023-6491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.