IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eko/ekoeko/28_56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debate. Pension reforms in Poland and Germany—achievements, failures and the future

Author

Listed:
  • Debate

Abstract

The conference included a panel discussion during which we discussed achievements, failures and the future of pension system reforms in Poland and Germany. The main panelists were: Marek Góra, Warsaw School of Economics, co-author of the pension reform in Poland, Jeremi Mordasewicz, representative of The Polish Confederation of Private Employers at the ZUS Supervisory Board, Viktor Steiner, Freie Universit?t Berlin and DIW-Berlin. According to our plans Edward Whitehouse, pension specialist in the Social Policy division, OECD was supposed to be the fourth panelist. Unfortunately, he was unable to reach Warsaw, due to the protests against the pension reform, which took place in France at that time. This is a good example that pension reforms are important not only for specialists and politicians, but also for ordinary citizens. The debate was moderated by Micha? Myck, CenEA and DIW-Berlin. The transcript was smoothed out by Grzegorz Kula in order to preserve a style of the debate but at the same time.

Suggested Citation

  • Debate, 2011. "Debate. Pension reforms in Poland and Germany—achievements, failures and the future," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 28.
    • Handle: RePEc:eko:ekoeko:28_56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ekonomia.wne.uw.edu.pl/ekonomia/getFile/332
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eko:ekoeko:28_56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.