IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind the Gap:Unification, EU Membership and Regional Disparity in Cyprus


  • Mehmet Ugur

    (University of Greenwich)


This paper examines the possible implications of EU membership for the North-South development gap in Cyprus - assuming that the country would join as a federal entity. It reviews the debate on economic convergence and draws on research findings in the EU context. On balance, the theoretical and empirical work suggests that poorer EU regions have been able to grow faster following the deepening of integration. However, this result is based on a number of restrictive assumptions; the rate of convergence has been very low; and the performance of the regions has not been uniform. There is significant evidence suggesting that regional performance is strongly correlated to ‘institutional strength’ and efficient governance structures. Therefore, convergence between the Northern and Southern Cyprus cannot be taken for granted – even if the North benefits from Structural Funds support on an equal footing with other Objective 1 regions. To shorten the catching-up period, specific arrangements are necessary to address the adverse initial conditions in the North, which suffers from inefficient governance and weakened endogenous institutions. Otherwise, persistent inequality may threaten the sustainability of the federal solution, cause political uncertainty and make both communities worse-off in an age of global competition for markets as well as foreign direct investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Ugur, 2003. "Mind the Gap:Unification, EU Membership and Regional Disparity in Cyprus," Ekonomia, Cyprus Economic Society and University of Cyprus, vol. 6(1), pages 53-71, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekn:ekonom:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:53-71

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. H Biçak & M Altinay & H Ingham & M Ingham, 2005. "Kok and bull? Lisbon, the EES and (more) enlargement," Working Papers 567016, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekn:ekonom:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:53-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Managing Editor to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.