IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v39y2019i2p285-305id37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How QUALIS CAPES influences Brazilian academic production? A stimulus or a barrier for advancement?

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Andrey Almeida Lopes Fernandes
  • Leonardo de Oliveira Manchini

Abstract

This study delves into the consequences of QUALIS CAPES. To do that, data on the editorial boards of the journals classified as A1 and A2 in the areas of Business, Accounting and Tourism; and Economics are collected. Findings show that the US and the UK dominate the academic production. Brazil and other emerging countries are not relevant. Issues of the five top journals of each area were analyzed, showing that QUALIS may bias research in the country to issues not connected to Brazilian questions. JEL Classification: O3; O38.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Andrey Almeida Lopes Fernandes & Leonardo de Oliveira Manchini, 2019. "How QUALIS CAPES influences Brazilian academic production? A stimulus or a barrier for advancement?," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 39(2), pages 285-305.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:285-305:id:37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/37/32
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Development; government policy; research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:285-305:id:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.