IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v22y2002i4p670-684id958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics and philosophy: tension and solution in Adam Smith’s work

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Ganem

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show that Adam Smith’s work is indeed unified as can be seen from the fundamental concepts pervading both The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The Wealth of Nations. This approach opposes the canonical reading of Adam Smith’s work, in the sense that it links together four key concepts nested parities in a successive chain of three intersecting groups leading, ultimately, to the unified understanding of his contribution, apparently disperse into several independent pieces. The four concepts organized into three groups are: experience and imagination, imagination and morality and morality and self-interest. The conclusion is that, according to Adam Smith, The Wealth must be read in the light of the TMS; the invisible hand feeds back on the actual morality, economy and moral come together without any conflict under the justification of the social order provided by the market. JEL Classification: B1.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Ganem, 2002. "Economics and philosophy: tension and solution in Adam Smith’s work," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 22(4), pages 670-684.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:22:y:2002:i:4:p:670-684:id:958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/958/2167
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic thought; Adam Smith; morality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B1 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:22:y:2002:i:4:p:670-684:id:958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.