IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v13y1993i1p162-167id1320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hirschman and the rethoric of reaction

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Valéria Junho Pena

Abstract

The communication deals with the 1991’s book of Albert O. Hirschman, Rhetoricof reaction: perversity. futility. Jeopardy, showing its importance in relation with thecontemporary debate on the possibilities of the welfare state. The thesis of Hirschman is thatthe contemporary conservative criticism on the welfare state is a revival of the thesis thathad been already argued before opposing the expansion of civil and political rights. The sameway as those rights, contemporary social rights would: (i) produce the contrary of whatis the desire of policymakers; (ii) produce no effect at all; (iii) cost too much, jeopardizingdemocracy or economic growth. Perversity, futility and jeopardy are the main attributes ofaction according to the conservative view; that’s why its proposal is so reactionary. That iswhy, as well, considering the danger of action, its success rests on its competence to persuadethat history not allowing anything to be done or to be created. Politics is just a case foradministrative skills. JEL Classification: Y30.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Valéria Junho Pena, 1993. "Hirschman and the rethoric of reaction," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 13(1), pages 162-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:13:y:1993:i:1:p:162-167:id:1320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/1320/1306
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Review; Hirschman;

    JEL classification:

    • Y30 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Book Reviews - - - Book Reviews

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:13:y:1993:i:1:p:162-167:id:1320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.