Author
Abstract
Este trabalho tem como principal objetivo analisar as inovações institucionais e as contradições inseridas na abordagem territorial para o planejamento e implementação de políticas públicas no Brasil. A partir de 2003, surgiram vários programas elaborados no âmbito do governo federal com base em uma perspectiva territorial. De maneira geral, esses programas têm em comum: definir um recorte espacial para sua atuação, priorizar áreas de concentração de pobreza, atuar de forma descentralizada e priorizar instâncias coletivas de deliberação e participação social. Porém, persistem alguns entraves para uma consolidação e institucionalização de fato da abordagem territorial para a ação estatal no Brasil. Entende-se que a retórica discursiva presente nos documentos oficiais não foi acompanhada por inovações normativas que a legitime. Por outro lado, as experiências em curso já desencadearam bons resultados, como a formação de novos arranjos institucionais locais e a maior aproximação entre atores sociais e a gestão de políticas e projetos territoriais.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Políticas públicas, planejamento governamental, territórios de incidência, participação social, desenvolvimento territorial.ABSTRACTThe main objective of this research is to analyze the institutional innovations and contradictions embedded in the territorial approach to the planning and implementation of public policies in Brazil. Since 2003, there were several programs established under the federal government based on a territorial perspective. In general, these programs have in common: to define a spatial area for its action, to prioritize areas of concentrated poverty, to work in a decentralized manner and to prioritize instances of collective deliberation and participation. However, there remain some barriers to consolidation and institutionalization of the territorial approach to state action in Brazil. It is understood that the discursive rhetoric in official documents was not accompanied by innovations in rhythm normative legitimacy. On the other hand, the current experiments have triggered good results, as the formation of new institutional arrangements and closer relations between local actors and social policy management and territorial projects.KEYWORDS: Public policy, government planning, territories of incidence, social participation, territorial development.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:ekm:cgpc00:v:17:y:2012:i:60:id:4043
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:cgpc00:v:17:y:2012:i:60:id:4043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Denise Francisco Cândido (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.