IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/cgpc00/v14y2009i55id44201.html

Analyzing the infl uence of economics on management education and practice: a criticism through the concept of development

Author

Listed:
  • José Antonio Puppim de Oliveira

    (Universidade das Nações Unidas (UNU-IAS))

Abstract

This article is a criticism of the neoclassical economics infl uence on theories of management using the experience and lessons from the evolution of the debates in development studies. I argue that this infl uence has introduced values that are incompatible with the values of what could be a socially responsible society in a modern view of what is development. The article fi rstly examines the evolution of the debates of the concept of development, as they moved from being forums dominated exclusively by economists – who saw development as synonym of economic growth – to a multi and interdisciplinary debate over several dimensions of development, including social, environmental and democracy issues. Secondly, it criticizes management theories based on neoclassical economics through the experience of the development debate. I argue that management theories based on economics see the management solutions as a one-way alternative (market- based solutions), infl uence the thinking of both the means and the ends of organizations, and have propagated a series of values that are not compatible with a socially developed society.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ekm:cgpc00:v:14:y:2009:i:55:id:44201
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/44201
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/download/44201/43075
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:cgpc00:v:14:y:2009:i:55:id:44201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Denise Francisco Cândido (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.