IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v17y2020i2p508-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What 21st-Century Works Will Merit a Close Reading in 2050?: First Tranche of Responses

Author

Abstract

Collected here are nine responses to the question, “What 21st-century works will merit a close reading in 2050?” Clarifications of that question are provided in the prologue. The nine respondents are Niclas Berggren, Arthur Diamond, Lanny Ebenstein, David George, Hannes Gissurarson, Charles Goodhart, Jimena Hurtado, Daniel Klein, and Arnold Kling. In the future another tranche of responses will be provided, from respondents with last names beginning L through Z (link).

Suggested Citation

  • Econ Journal Watch, 2020. "What 21st-Century Works Will Merit a Close Reading in 2050?: First Tranche of Responses," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 508–522-5, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:508-522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1156/ReadworthySept2020.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1207
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ephemera; great books; civilization; Edmund Burke; wisdom; virtue;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:508-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.