IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v17y2020i1p28-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brought Into the Open: How the U.S. Compares to Other Countries in the Rate of Public Mass Shooters

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Lott, Jr.
  • Carlisle E. Moody

Abstract

Adam Lankford (2016) claims that the United States accounted for 31 percent of the world’s public mass shooters over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012. After four years of extensive worldwide media coverage, Lankford—in response to our paper (Lott and Moody 2019)—finally made one of his datasets available. In doing so, he revealed that he used a definition of public mass shootings that is inconsistent with those of the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the New York Police Department that he had claimed to be following. We find that his dataset does not even follow his own definition. He has included cases for the United States that do not fit his definition and excluded foreign cases that are consistent with his definition. His handling of data greatly exaggerates the U.S. share of public mass shooters. Using our data, we estimate the number of shooters using the NYPD definition that Lankford claims to use. We find that the U.S. has 1.25 percent of the world’s mass shooters. We provide a table that displays results for a variety of possible definitions, including Lankford’s now supposed definition, all of which are a fraction of the 31 percent that Lankford claims.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Lott, Jr. & Carlisle E. Moody, 2020. "Brought Into the Open: How the U.S. Compares to Other Countries in the Rate of Public Mass Shooters," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28–39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:28-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1146/LottMoodyMar2020.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1200
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:28-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.