IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejn/ejbmjr/v9y2021i2p139-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile Probability Predictions: A Demonstrative Performance Analysis of Forecasts of US COVID-19 Deaths

Author

Listed:
  • Mary E. Thomson

    (Northumbria University, UK)

  • Andrew C. Pollock

    (Statistical Analyst, UK)

  • Jennifer Murray

    (Edinburgh Napier University, UK)

Abstract

An analytical framework is presented for the evaluation of quantile probability forecasts. It is demonstrated using weekly quantile forecasts of changes in the number of US COVID-19 deaths. Empirical quantiles are derived using the assumption that daily changes in a variable follow a normal distribution with time varying means and standard deviations, which can be assumed constant over short horizons such as one week. These empirical quantiles are used to evaluate quantile forecasts using the Mean Squared Quantile Score (MSQS), which, in turn, is decomposed into sub-components involving bias, resolution and error variation to identify specific aspects of performance, which highlight the strengths and weaknesses of forecasts. The framework is then extended to test if performance enhancement can be achieved by combining diverse forecasts from different sources. The demonstration illustrates that the technique can effectively evaluate quantile forecasting performance based on a limited number of data points, which is crucial in emergency situations such as forecasting pandemic behavior. It also shows that combining the predictions with quantile probability forecasts generated from an Autoregressive Order One, AR(1) model provided substantially improved performance. The implications of these findings are discussed, suggestions are offered for future research and potential limitations are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary E. Thomson & Andrew C. Pollock & Jennifer Murray, 2021. "Quantile Probability Predictions: A Demonstrative Performance Analysis of Forecasts of US COVID-19 Deaths," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 9(2), pages 139-163.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejn:ejbmjr:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:139-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/EJBM-9.2.4.1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejn:ejbmjr:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:139-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esra Barakli (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.