IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Asymmetric Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Innovation Variance Breaks: Threshold versus Consistent-Threshold Estimation

Listed author(s):
  • S Cook
  • N Manning
Registered author(s):

    Kim et al. (2002) demonstrate that the Dickey-Fuller unit root test can experience severe size distortion when a large decrease in the innovation variance occurs early in the sample period, leading to spurious rejection of the null. We extend this analysis to the case of spurious identification of asymmetric stationarity by the MTAR test of Enders and Granger (1998) under similar circumstances. In terms of unit root testing, the properties of the MTAR test are inferior to those of the Dickey-Fuller test. However, the MTAR test with consistent-threshold estimation outperforms both the Dickey-Fuller and the original MTAR tests when considering the unit root hypothesis; size distortion being dramatically reduced. The consistent MTAR test is also to be preferred to the original MTAR test when testing the joint hypothesis of non-stationarity and symmetry since the original test can display considerable undersizing. However, the size of the consistent MTAR test is approximately nominal in all experiments except when extreme changes in innovation variance occur towards the beginning of the sample period.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Issues in its journal Economic Issues.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2003)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 47-58

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eis:articl:103cook
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eis:articl:103cook. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan Wheatley)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.