IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eis/articl/103cook.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Innovation Variance Breaks: Threshold versus Consistent-Threshold Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • S Cook
  • N Manning

Abstract

Kim et al. (2002) demonstrate that the Dickey-Fuller unit root test can experience severe size distortion when a large decrease in the innovation variance occurs early in the sample period, leading to spurious rejection of the null. We extend this analysis to the case of spurious identification of asymmetric stationarity by the MTAR test of Enders and Granger (1998) under similar circumstances. In terms of unit root testing, the properties of the MTAR test are inferior to those of the Dickey-Fuller test. However, the MTAR test with consistent-threshold estimation outperforms both the Dickey-Fuller and the original MTAR tests when considering the unit root hypothesis; size distortion being dramatically reduced. The consistent MTAR test is also to be preferred to the original MTAR test when testing the joint hypothesis of non-stationarity and symmetry since the original test can display considerable undersizing. However, the size of the consistent MTAR test is approximately nominal in all experiments except when extreme changes in innovation variance occur towards the beginning of the sample period.

Suggested Citation

  • S Cook & N Manning, 2003. "Asymmetric Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Innovation Variance Breaks: Threshold versus Consistent-Threshold Estimation," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 8(1), pages 47-58, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eis:articl:103cook
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economicissues.org.uk/Files/2003/103dAssymetricUnitRootTestsinthePrresenceofInnovationVarianceBreaks.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eis:articl:103cook. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan Wheatley). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bsntuuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.