IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Testing for Unit Roots: Threshold Autoregression and Asymmetric Trend Stationarity

Listed author(s):
  • S Cook
Registered author(s):

    In recent research Enders and Granger (1998) have extended the Augmented Dickey Fuller statistic to allow the unit root hypothesis to be tested against an alternative of stationarity with asymmetric adjustment. In this paper the threshold autoregressive (TAR) and momentum threshold autoregressive (MTAR) unit root tests proposed by Enders and Granger are applied to data on UK investment. It is found that the TAR, MTAR and standard Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests fail to reject the unit root hypothesis. In contrast, an alternative modified TAR unit root test is proposed which rejects non stationarity using specifically derived Monte Carlo critical values. Further testing rejects the null hypothesis of symmetric adjustment, with the form of asymmetry detected supporting recent theoretical predictions for investment behaviour presented by Gale (1996). The results obtained show the form of asymmetry incorporated within the Enders-Granger test to critically influence the resulting inferences drawn.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Economic Issues in its journal Economic Issues.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 59-66

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eis:articl:101cook
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eis:articl:101cook. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan Wheatley)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.