IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eip/journl/y2012i3p119-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and forecasting of the likelihood of tacit collusion in oligopolistic markets

Author

Listed:
  • M. Dragun, I. Ivanovskaya

Abstract

The article is devoted to a methodological framework to identify and prevent price collusions on the commodity markets. The main research methods are mathematical modeling and hypothesis testing. Our results are original in several ways. We developed a method of quantitative analysis and prediction of the time stability of the producers' concerted action on the prices in the commodity markets, which can predispose oligopolistic product markets to the emergence of price fixing and to develop measures to curb the producers' anticompetitive practices. The novelty of the method lies in the fact that we have identified a list of internal and external factors and the likelihood of collusion sustainability, indicators to assess their value as well as theoretically proved the formula for calculating the thresholds discount factor. The article presents the results of testing the method on the example of Belarus chipboard market. It is established that, in the researched period, the market had a high propensity for the emergence of coordinated actions on prices. Based on the analysis of social welfare losses due to the presence in the market price collusion, we have concluded that there is no need for its antitrust regulation, as the collusion between the chipboard manufacturers will be greatly destabilized as a result of the state's economic policy.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Dragun, I. Ivanovskaya, 2012. "Assessment and forecasting of the likelihood of tacit collusion in oligopolistic markets," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 3, pages 119-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:eip:journl:y:2012:i:3:p:119-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eip.org.ua/docs/EP_12_3_119_ru.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eip:journl:y:2012:i:3:p:119-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Bazhal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://eip.org.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.