IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v32y2010i3p229-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Documentation and quality - Quo vadis patent system? A patent attorney's view

Author

Listed:
  • Werner Kovac

Abstract

Various aspects and developments of the world - especially the European - patent system relating to documentation at large, and ultimately to the quality of patents are described and commented upon: international cooperation, the Community Patent, machine translation, office backlogs, the Patent Network, quality standards and inventive merit are amongst the areas explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Werner Kovac, 2010. "Documentation and quality - Quo vadis patent system? A patent attorney's view," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 229-232, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:229-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(09)00090-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boeing, Philipp & Mueller, Elisabeth, 2015. "Measuring patent quality in international comparison: Index development and application to China," ZEW Discussion Papers 15-051, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:229-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.