IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v2y1980i3p103-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IPC and NACE classification of patents. A comparison between data on U.S. and on French, German and U.K. patents

Author

Listed:
  • Kronz, Hermann
  • Grevink, Hans
  • Grevink, Hans

Abstract

This article is a review of the principal results of a statistical study of the US-patented applications filed during the period 1969 to 1974. The study itself will be published as EUR-Report No 6575. The US data are classified according to the IPC and are compared with those of the Federal Republic of Germany, France and the United Kingdom, with regard to their quantitative distribution over selected technological classes. Further, the technological trends within selected classes are highlighted. An attempt has also been made to link the patent statistical data to the industrial branches classified according to the NACE.

Suggested Citation

  • Kronz, Hermann & Grevink, Hans & Grevink, Hans, 1980. "IPC and NACE classification of patents. A comparison between data on U.S. and on French, German and U.K. patents," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 103-115.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:2:y:1980:i:3:p:103-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0172-2190(80)90053-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:2:y:1980:i:3:p:103-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.