IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v21y1999i2p85-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IPC revision - the future

Author

Listed:
  • Calvert, J.

Abstract

This article provides a broad overview of the current position of the International Patent Classification (IPC). Following 30 years of intensive development and improvement, it is applied by the vast majority of patent and intellectual property offices around the world. But there remain problems, for example the inconsistencies of application of specific terms, the use of different editions, little backlogging, and differences in depth of coverage - both technically and chronologically. Other problems arise from the length and formality of the revision process, which prevent the International Patent Classification (IPC) reacting sufficiently rapidly to changes of technology in the patents themselves or to changes in information retrieval technology, to the use of the Internet or to the use of commercial electronic databases. Four steps to alleviate these problems are proposed: - reduce the revision period from 5 to 3 years; - modernise the procedural aspects of the revision process; - discontinue the practice of translation into the second authentic text language in the course of the revision process; - move away from the concept of a "single pigeon-hole" for each patent specification, to a more flexible, electronically based hybrid system with wider classification and obligatory indexing.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvert, J., 1999. "IPC revision - the future," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 85-87, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:21:y:1999:i:2:p:85-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(99)00034-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:21:y:1999:i:2:p:85-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.