IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v18y1996i4p215-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistics and analysis of relevant citations in international search reports in the CPO

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Lingling

Abstract

Since China acceded to the PCT in 1994, the Chinese Patent Office has been establishing examination search files to meet the requirements of the PCT minimum documentation. In order to have a basis for future work, this paper gives statistics and analysis by categories of the relevant documents cited in 159 PCT international search reports which the CPO finished in 1994 and 1995, including countries, number of documents and technical fields. The conclusions are as follows: 1. (1) the technical fields of the majority of Chinese patents seeking protection outside China in 1994 and 1995 claimed medical apparatus and instruments, and health care medicines;2. (2) at present, the starting year for search files should be fixed temporarily at 1920;3. (3) in PCT international search reports made in the CPO, US patents were cited most often, followed by Chinese documents, then European documents. Japanese documents were fourth and PCT documents fifth; and4. (4) the most common languages used by the examiners carrying out these searches were English and Chinese.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Lingling, 1996. "Statistics and analysis of relevant citations in international search reports in the CPO," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 215-217, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:18:y:1996:i:4:p:215-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172-2190(96)00025-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:18:y:1996:i:4:p:215-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.