IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v16y1994i2p83-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey on EPO -- DG1 search quality

Author

Listed:
  • Schryvers, H. J.
  • Kuhn, E.
  • Vangheluwe, A.

Abstract

EPO -- DG1 made an inquiry amongst its most important users of the European patenting procedure. This was effected during the second quarter of 1992 and gave a response rate of 47.3%. The general opinion on satisfaction level for quality is situated at 93.6% and the satisfaction level for the most important specific aspects of search activity varies between 88.5% and 93.6%. Less important aspects were rated at a level between 70.3% and 81.1%.

Suggested Citation

  • Schryvers, H. J. & Kuhn, E. & Vangheluwe, A., 1994. "Survey on EPO -- DG1 search quality," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 83-89, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:16:y:1994:i:2:p:83-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0172-2190(94)90016-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:16:y:1994:i:2:p:83-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.