IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/worpat/v15y1993i3p147-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of missing patents at the United States patent and trademark office

Author

Listed:
  • Wherry, Timothy Lee

Abstract

Recent articles in newspapers and magazines have suggested that many patent documents are missing from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO); however, no survey has been published which attempts to verify the truth of this claim. This article reports on work undertaken to sample a number of patent classifications to determine if patents themselves are missing from the files of the PTO. The research, limited in that it can only measure patents and not patent applications or accompanying documentation, shows that missing patents are common and that each of the classifications surveyed contained missing patents. The situation may not be as bad as reported, however, in that the PTO does maintain a backup file on microfilm and Patent Depositories across the United States also maintain at least partial holdings of United States Patents on microfilm.

Suggested Citation

  • Wherry, Timothy Lee, 1993. "A survey of missing patents at the United States patent and trademark office," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 147-149, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:15:y:1993:i:3:p:147-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0172-2190(93)90005-H
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:worpat:v:15:y:1993:i:3:p:147-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/654/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.