IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v213y2026ics1366554526003418.html

A SMAA-based framework for robustness analysis in multi-criteria facility location under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Pereira, Javier
  • Contreras, Pedro
  • Taramasco, Carla
  • Figueroa, Rodrigo
  • Gacitúa, Ricardo

Abstract

Logistics hub selection is a multi-criteria decision problem characterized by conflicting objectives, uncertain data, and diverse stakeholder perspectives. This study addresses the Multi-Criteria Facility Location Problem under uncertainty faced by a multi-stakeholder association of courier companies in Chile. We propose a robustness analysis framework that applies three SMAA methods independently under equivalent conditions (SMAA-2 for utility-based rationality, SMAA-P for outranking rationality, and SMAA-T for behavioral rationality), using the convergence of their resulting rankings as an indicator of solution stability across distinct decision rationalities. We introduce a robustness taxonomy and three action-oriented decision sets that translate convergence patterns into practical guidance for stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Pereira, Javier & Contreras, Pedro & Taramasco, Carla & Figueroa, Rodrigo & Gacitúa, Ricardo, 2026. "A SMAA-based framework for robustness analysis in multi-criteria facility location under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526003418
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2026.105002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554526003418
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2026.105002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526003418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.