Author
Listed:
- van der Hagen, Liana
- Agatz, Niels
- Spliet, Remy
Abstract
In grocery home delivery, most retailers allow customers to select a delivery time slot for receiving their orders. Since delivery capacity (vehicles and drivers) is typically fixed in the short term, retailers must use it efficiently. To do this, they may dynamically restrict which time slots are available to new customers based on orders already accepted. This demand management is complicated by a key uncertainty: customers often reserve their delivery slot before finalizing their shopping basket. As a result, retailers do not know how large each order will be when allocating delivery capacity, making it difficult to determine how much vehicle capacity to reserve for each customer during the booking process. We study how basket size uncertainty affects time slot management for attended home delivery. To address this challenge, we propose fast decision-making strategies that use basket size scenarios to assess whether accepting a new order will likely result in a feasible delivery schedule. These strategies, based on heuristics and machine learning, are evaluated on their impact on overall system performance. Our experiments demonstrate the strengths and limitations of each approach. Insertion heuristics accept fewer customer orders and require increasing computation time as the number of customers grows, limiting scalability. In contrast, machine learning-based scenario approaches and simple threshold methods scale more effectively and accommodate more customers, though they must balance feasibility constraints against order acceptance rates. Overall, our study provides practical, scalable strategies for online grocery retailers to manage time slot availability when basket sizes are uncertain at booking. These insights can be adapted to different operational contexts and business priorities.
Suggested Citation
van der Hagen, Liana & Agatz, Niels & Spliet, Remy, 2026.
"Feasibility assessment in attended home delivery with basket uncertainty,"
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transe:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s136655452600284x
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2026.104945
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s136655452600284x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.