IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v212y2026ics1366554526002991.html

How can sellers react to consumers’ anticipated regret with service gap between channels

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Yang
  • Fan, Yaodong
  • Chan, Hing Kai
  • Wang, Wenbin

Abstract

This paper investigates the operational decisions of competing online and offline retailers with consideration of consumers’ anticipated regret. Consumers are divided into two segments as informed and uninformed according to whether they correctly understand the valuation of offline service. For uninformed consumers, the misperception of the offline services valuation may trigger regret after purchase. To this end, we develop a game mode with consumers’ anticipated regret behaviour and derive the retailers’ optimal pricing strategies and offline service quality decisions. Furthermore, the O2O cooperating case is extended which allows online purchases to enjoy the offline service as well. Our results show that (1) Consumers’ uncertainty regarding the valuation of offline services gives rise to two distinct equilibrium outcomes, depending on whether the offline store targets sales to uninformed consumers or not. (2) A higher level of anticipated regret prompts a superior service quality and augments retailers’ profits. (3) O2O cooperation does not invariably benefit both online and offline retailers. Interestingly, cooperation may result in reduced service quality, and consumers anticipated regret can actually undermine retailers’ willingness to collaborate.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Yang & Fan, Yaodong & Chan, Hing Kai & Wang, Wenbin, 2026. "How can sellers react to consumers’ anticipated regret with service gap between channels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526002991
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2026.104960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554526002991
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2026.104960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526002991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.