Author
Listed:
- Li, Yingmei
- Liu, Huaile
- Yang, Zhonghai
Abstract
A firm’s position in a supply chain network shapes its ability to access resources, control information, and diversify risks, thereby influencing its competitive advantage. As climate change intensifies, once climate risk is recognized and enters the managerial agenda, it may trigger the contraction and reconfiguration of supply chain relationships, altering the firm’s relative position in the network. Integrating social network theory with the attention‑based view and threat‑rigidity theory, this study constructs a text‑based measure capturing whether climate risk is “discussed and attended to” at the firm level. Using a sample of Chinese A‑share listed firms from 2013 to 2023, we examine the impact of climate risk on supply chain network positions and its boundary conditions. The findings show that climate risk significantly erodes firms’ network position advantages. This effect is more pronounced among firms with higher environmental performance, stronger trade credit, and greater analyst coverage. The results point to a “resilience trade‑off”: under heightened climate risk, factors typically associated with resilience can instead intensify position erosion through mechanisms such as deepening institutional rigidity, credit relational lock-in, and external pressure amplification. Theoretically, this study moves the climate‑risk literature beyond functional outcomes to firms’ structural embeddedness in supply chain networks, replaces an exposure‑based view with a managerial‑agenda perspective in measuring climate risk, and clarifies a resilience trade-off mechanism whereby conventional resilience factors can, under climate‑risk pressures, inadvertently heighten network vulnerability. Practically, the findings guide firms to integrate climate‑risk management with managerial objectives and network reconfiguration, encourage supply chains to build collaborative governance and risk‑buffering mechanisms and inform policymakers in emerging economies to design coordinated governance and incentives that jointly enhance supply‑chain climate resilience and industrial‑chain security.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s136655452600205x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.