Author
Listed:
- Liu, Lixi
- Zhao, Ming
- Zeng, Xirui
- Su, Simeng
Abstract
Integrating multiple interrelated operational problems and jointly optimizing them is crucial for enhancing the order-picking efficiency of Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems (RMFS). However, most prior studies on RMFS joint optimization have focused on either order-oriented or robot-oriented issues, with limited attention to both aspects simultaneously. Additionally, few studies have comprehensively compared commonly used task allocation strategies and explored their optimal parameter settings. This study proposes a joint optimization framework that integrates order assignment, order sequencing, pod selection, task allocation, pod sequencing, path planning, and conflict resolution, enabling the exploration of optimal task allocation strategies. A novel Traffic Rule-Based Conflict Resolution Strategy (TR-CRS) is developed by refining conflict resolution based on robots’ relative positions. Simulation results show that TR-CRS outperforms the conventional Picking-Status-Based Conflict Resolution Strategy (PS-CRS) in improving overall order picking efficiency. Simulation experiments reveal that the Work Amount-based Task Allocation Strategy (WA-TAS) outperforms other task allocation strategies. However, as the number of robots increases, system efficiency initially rises but then declines, indicating that simply adding more robots does not always improve performance. Further scenario experiments and generalizability assessments indicate that the parameter α significantly affects WA-TAS performance. As order volume increases, both the optimal number of robots and α stabilize, suggesting that using smaller order volumes with sequential α values—requiring minimal simulation time—can determine the optimal parameter configurations. This work offers new perspectives and valuable insights into identifying optimal task allocation strategies and their parameter settings to enhance RMFS efficiency through the emerging simulation-based optimization paradigm.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526001468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.