IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v210y2026ics1366554526001109.html

Consensus fixing for two-stage stochastic optimization – applied to stochastic prize collecting TSP

Author

Listed:
  • Pisinger, David

Abstract

We consider two-stage stochastic optimization problems, where both the first-stage and second-stage problems may contain binary variables. A highly parallel heuristic is presented based on consensus fixing: The problems are solved independently for each scenario using a variable neighborhood search heuristic. Then, the scenarios try to reach consensus about fixing a single first-stage variable, using various score and select functions. The process of alternating between solving independent scenarios and variable fixing is repeated until all first-stage variables have been fixed. Since all second-stage problems are independent, the framework lends itself well to a parallel implementation. The general framework is tested on a two-stage stochastic prize collecting traveling salesman problem. The first-stage customers (subscription customers) are to be served every day, while the second-stage customers (on-demand customers) fluctuate from day to day. Computational results are reported for instances with up to 500 first-stage and 500 second-stage customers involving up to 128 scenarios, showing that high-quality solutions are obtained within a few minutes, and the solution times scale well with the number of scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Pisinger, David, 2026. "Consensus fixing for two-stage stochastic optimization – applied to stochastic prize collecting TSP," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526001109
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2026.104770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554526001109
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2026.104770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526001109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.