IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v209y2026ics1366554526001067.html

To persuade or not? Equilibrium analysis of livestreaming demonstration strategy with product returns

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Sujuan
  • Duan, Yongrui
  • Huo, Jiazhen

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving digital economy, livestreaming e-commerce has emerged as a key strategy for brands to manage consumer fit uncertainty and the associated consumer returns. This study investigates two prevalent livestreaming demonstration modes: (i) authentic demonstration, which helps resolve consumers fit uncertainty before purchase, reduces returns, and alleviates reverse logistics pressure, and (ii) persuasive demonstration, which amplifies consumers’ perceived value to encourage more purchases while postponing the resolution of uncertainty until after purchase, potentially increasing returns likelihood and reverse logistics burden. We employ theoretical models to analyze equilibrium pricing and brands’ choice of livestreaming demonstration modes in the presence of consumer returns. We find that product characteristics significantly influence the optimal choice of demonstration mode. Specifically, for high-fit products, brands prefer the persuasive demonstration. For low-fit products, the choice depends on the strength of the persuasion effect. If the persuasion effect is strong, brands prefer the persuasive demonstration despite higher product returns and reverse logistics costs. Otherwise, if the persuasion effect is weak, brands prefer the authentic demonstration to reduce returns. Interestingly, although the authentic demonstration enables consumers to access more transparent and comprehensive product information before purchase, it harms consumer surplus due to an indirect price effect, whereas the persuasive demonstration may improve consumer surplus. Additionally, when brands choose to switch from non-livestreaming mode to livestreaming demonstration modes, the persuasive demonstration exhibits relatively lower sensitivity to demonstration costs compared to the authentic demonstration. Specifically, if the persuasion effect is strong, brands of high-fit products are more likely to switch to persuasive demonstration even when incurring higher demonstration costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Sujuan & Duan, Yongrui & Huo, Jiazhen, 2026. "To persuade or not? Equilibrium analysis of livestreaming demonstration strategy with product returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:209:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526001067
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2026.104766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554526001067
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2026.104766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:209:y:2026:i:c:s1366554526001067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.