Author
Listed:
- Raj, Ashish
- Das, Debabrata
- Sawik, Tadeusz
Abstract
In the rapidly expanding Q-commerce sector, which promises delivery to customers within 10––15 min, even the slightest disruption can impose substantial harm on the growth and reputation of businesses. This study examines the optimization of dark store resilient portfolio, i.e., dark store selection and protection against disruptions, alongside strategic allocation of risk mitigation inventory at the protected dark stores. We develop a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to minimize costs linked to protection and prepositioning of inventory at dark stores as well as costs related to pick-up and delivery of customers’ orders and stockouts. Additionally, we incorporate risk assessment measures such as value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk in the MILP model to evaluate a Q-commerce company’s risk-averse decisions, and compare risk-neutral with risk-averse strategies for analysing impact of disruption risks in the operations of dark stores. The findings suggest that protecting key dark stores and allocating more customer orders to these protected dark stores would maintain continuity in customer order fulfilment during disruptive events. The results further highlight the quantity of risk mitigation inventory that needs to be prepositioned at the protected dark store for better inventory decisions under disruption risks. Moreover, we also observe that dark stores exhibiting higher disruption risk are usually not selected for order fulfilment unless protected, emphasizing the importance of operational resilience. Finally, this study uncovers various managerial insights for Q-commerce companies in effectively implementing a resilient strategy, thereby enabling decision-makers to improve the overall performance of dark stores.
Suggested Citation
Raj, Ashish & Das, Debabrata & Sawik, Tadeusz, 2026.
"Mitigating disruption impact in Q-commerce through optimization of dark store resilient portfolio,"
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transe:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s1366554525005460
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104518
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s1366554525005460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.