Author
Listed:
- Cantini, Alessandra
- Leoni, Leonardo
- Ferraro, Saverio
- Carlo, Filippo De
Abstract
Optimizing Distribution Networks (DNs) is crucial for retailers, impacting service levels and logistics costs. A key DN configuration decision is the stock deployment policy, which entails choosing between centralized, decentralized, and hybrid DNs for each Stock Keeping Unit (SKU). Choosing the stock deployment policy is complex due to many variables influencing the decision (e.g., number of customers served, SKU purchasing costs, customer demand, etc.). Moreover, this decision must be revisited whenever customer demands changes, which can be time-consuming when DN resilience is challenged by geopolitical changes, market trends, and disruptive events. Dimensional Analysis (DA), and particularly the Buckingham Theorem (BT), shows capabilities to support retailers in guiding and streamlining stock deployment decisions. After modeling the stock deployment problem in a mathematical form, BT can identify its influential variables, extract knowledge on how variables mutually interact when affecting the stock deployment performance, and aid informed decision-making on the most cost-effective policy. Accordingly, BT enables creating performance maps which compare the characteristics of different DNs and SKUs, then suggesting similar stock deployment decisions for similar (scaled) DNs and SKUs. Despite the potential utility of these performance maps, no prior study has explored BT’s capabilities for stock deployment decisions. This paper bridges this gap by proposing BT to create supportive maps for multidimensional scaling, similarity analysis, and economic performance prediction across centralized, decentralized, and hybrid DNs. The resultant maps provide retailers with visual decision support tools for associating similar DNs and SKUs with optimal stock deployment policies, ultimately improving DN performance and resilience.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525004764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.