IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v204y2025ics1366554525004697.html

Does supply chain visibility improve firm resilience: An organizational information processing theory perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jia, Fu
  • Hu, Shoufeng
  • Chen, Lujie

Abstract

As disruptions and unpredictability grow in global supply chains, boosting firm resilience has emerged as a key managerial priority. This research draws upon organizational information processing theory (OIPT) to explore how supply chain visibility influences firm resilience, as well as the factors that moderate this relationship. Our dataset consists of panel data for 526 publicly listed manufacturing firms in China, capturing information on their top five suppliers and customers between 2018 and 2023. In addition, data related to supply chain visibility were compiled from the companies’ official websites. The findings demonstrate that supply chain visibility significantly enhances firm resilience. Further analysis reveals that environmental complexity, customer concentration, financial slack, and inventory slack positively moderate this relationship, while environmental dynamism exerts a negative moderating effect. Supplier concentration fails to show a notable moderating influence. This research broadens the application of OIPT and offers actionable guidance for firms aiming to strengthen their resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia, Fu & Hu, Shoufeng & Chen, Lujie, 2025. "Does supply chain visibility improve firm resilience: An organizational information processing theory perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525004697
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525004697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525004697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.