IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v202y2025ics1366554525003400.html

A novel real-world human-robot collaboration scheduling problem: a combination of assembly line balancing and flow shop scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Ding, Peipei
  • Liu, Shi Qiang
  • Chen, Dewang
  • He, Yonghuan

Abstract

Nowadays, numerous manufacturing companies are striving to enhance their process performance by leveraging innovative technologies like collaborative robots. This paper introduces a novel Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) scheduling problem, motivated by an industry-university partnership project. For simplicity, this scheduling problem is named “ALB-HRC-FSS”, as it combines elements of the traditional Assembly Line Balancing (ALB) and Flow Shop Scheduling (FSS) problems while incorporating the concurrent use of human workers and collaborative robots. As far as we know, this study is among the first to link the ALB-HRC with the FSS from a mathematical standpoint. A detailed description of the proposed ALB-HRC-FSS problem setting is presented by numerical examples, disjunctive graphs and Gantt charts. A series of Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) models are developed to formulate the problem interactively. Due to computational complexity, a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm (i.e., a combination of Memetic Algorithm and Tabu Search) is developed to solve the ALB-HRC-FSS problem effectively. Computational experiments with scenario-based analysis are performed to verify the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed ALB-HRC-FSS methodology. As the ALB-HRC-FSS integrates the strengths of three research domains (i.e., assembly line balancing, human-robot collaboration and flow shop scheduling), this study contributes to designing a more holistic industrial system for reshaping manufacturing processes in the context of Industry 5.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding, Peipei & Liu, Shi Qiang & Chen, Dewang & He, Yonghuan, 2025. "A novel real-world human-robot collaboration scheduling problem: a combination of assembly line balancing and flow shop scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003400
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525003400
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay Dixon & Bryan Hong & Lynn Wu, 2021. "The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5586-5605, September.
    2. Keshvarparast, Ali & Katiraee, Niloofar & Finco, Serena & Calzavara, Martina, 2025. "Integrating collaboration scenarios and workforce individualization in collaborative assembly line balancing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2008. "A versatile algorithm for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 39-56, January.
    4. Liu, Shi Qiang & Kozan, Erhan, 2009. "Scheduling a flow shop with combined buffer conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 371-380, February.
    5. Borba, Leonardo & Ritt, Marcus & Miralles, Cristóbal, 2018. "Exact and heuristic methods for solving the Robotic Assembly Line Balancing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 146-156.
    6. Yong Yin & Kathryn E. Stecke & Dongni Li, 2018. "The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 848-861, January.
    7. Christian Weckenborg & Karsten Kieckhäfer & Christoph Müller & Martin Grunewald & Thomas S. Spengler, 2020. "Balancing of assembly lines with collaborative robots," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 93-132, April.
    8. Jiahong Cai & Haoyun Xue & Chengye Zheng & Hongyan Shi, 2025. "Improved dual-population genetic algorithm to solve human–robot collaborative assembly line balancing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(17), pages 6452-6474, September.
    9. Chang, Pei-Chann & Huang, Wei-Hsiu & Wu, Jheng-Long & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "A block mining and re-combination enhanced genetic algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 45-55.
    10. Ziwei Jia & Shulian Xie & Weimin Zhang, 2025. "Flexible task assignment and assembly scheduling for human-robot collaboration cell considering uncertainty," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(16), pages 6134-6154, August.
    11. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    12. Sarkar, Bishal Dey & Shardeo, Vipulesh & Dwivedi, Ashish & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "Digital transition from industry 4.0 to industry 5.0 in smart manufacturing: A framework for sustainable future," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Scholl, Armin, 2008. "Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 509-528, February.
    14. Shi Qiang Liu & Erhan Kozan & Mahmoud Masoud & Debiao Li & Kai Luo, 2025. "Multi-stage mine production timetabling with optimising the sizes of mining operations: an application of parallel-machine flow shop scheduling with lot streaming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(2), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Abdous, Mohammed-Amine & Delorme, Xavier & Battini, Daria & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2025. "Scenario-based optimization and simulation framework for human-centered Assembly Line Balancing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waldherr, Stefan & Knust, Sigrid & Briskorn, Dirk, 2017. "Synchronous flow shop problems: How much can we gain by leaving machines idle?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 15-24.
    2. Christian Weckenborg & Karsten Kieckhäfer & Christoph Müller & Martin Grunewald & Thomas S. Spengler, 2020. "Balancing of assembly lines with collaborative robots," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 93-132, April.
    3. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    4. Moreira, Mayron César O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2013. "Hybrid heuristics for planning job rotation schedules in assembly lines with heterogeneous workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 552-560.
    5. García-Villoria, Alberto & Corominas, Albert & Nadal, Adrià & Pastor, Rafael, 2018. "Solving the accessibility windows assembly line problem level 1 and variant 1 (AWALBP-L1-1) with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 882-895.
    6. Chica, Manuel & Bautista, Joaquín & Cordón, Óscar & Damas, Sergio, 2016. "A multiobjective model and evolutionary algorithms for robust time and space assembly line balancing under uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 55-68.
    7. Marcel Albus & Timothée Hornek & Werner Kraus & Marco F. Huber, 2025. "Towards scalability for resource reconfiguration in robotic assembly line balancing problems using a modified genetic algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1175-1199, February.
    8. Zhang, Xinchun & Sun, Murong & Liu, Jianxu & Xu, Aijia, 2024. "The nexus between industrial robot and employment in China: The effects of technology substitution and technology creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    10. Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda & Jordi Pereira & Harold Torrez-Meruvia & Mariona Vilà, 2021. "A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem with a Fixed Number of Workstations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Scholl, Armin & Fliedner, Malte & Boysen, Nils, 2010. "Absalom: Balancing assembly lines with assignment restrictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 688-701, February.
    12. Zhexuan Zhou & Yajie Dou & Jianbin Sun & Jiang Jiang & Yuejin Tan, 2017. "Sustainable Production Line Evaluation Based on Evidential Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Parames Chutima, 2022. "A comprehensive review of robotic assembly line balancing problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-34, January.
    14. Xuemei Qi & Hongtao Wang & Haihong Zhu & Ji Zhang & Fulong Chen & Jie Yang, 2016. "Fast local neighborhood search algorithm for the no-wait flow shop scheduling with total flow time minimization," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4957-4972, August.
    15. Ashish Yadav & Sunil Agrawal, 2022. "Mathematical model for robotic two-sided assembly line balancing problem with zoning constraints," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 395-408, February.
    16. Teixeira, Ewerton & Subramanian, Anand & Kramer, Hugo Harry, 2026. "A hybrid population-based ruin-and-recreate algorithm for the blocking flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 329(2), pages 391-404.
    17. Koltai, Tamás & Dimény, Imre & Gallina, Viola & Gaal, Alexander & Sepe, Chiara, 2021. "An analysis of task assignment and cycle times when robots are added to human-operated assembly lines, using mathematical programming models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Sternatz, Johannes, 2014. "Enhanced multi-Hoffmann heuristic for efficiently solving real-world assembly line balancing problems in automotive industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 740-754.
    19. Dian Huang & Zhaofang Mao & Kan Fang & Enyuan Fu & Michael L. Pinedo, 2025. "An Improved Combinatorial Benders Decomposition Algorithm for the Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Line Balancing Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 1267-1283, September.
    20. Andrzej Kozik, 2017. "Handling precedence constraints in scheduling problems by the sequence pair representation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 445-472, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.