IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v201y2025ics1366554525002650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A representative model and benchmark suite for the container stowage planning problem

Author

Listed:
  • Sivertsen, Agnieszka
  • Reinhardt, Line
  • Jensen, Rune Møller

Abstract

Due to limited access to domain knowledge and domain-relevant benchmark data, the Container Stowage Planning Problem (CSPP) is notably under-researched. In particular, previous models of the CSPP have lacked two key aspects of the problem: lashing forces and paired block stowage. The former may reduce vessel capacity by up to 10%, and the latter is NP-hard. The Representative CSPP (RCSPP), which captures all critical aspects of the problem is formulated. The presented RCSPP incorporates overlooked constraints such as paired block stowage and lashing, along with an innovative method for estimating lashing forces, all while maintaining simplicity. A heuristic method, STOW, has been developed to identify solutions for the RCSPP using a specially designed benchmark suite based on real-world scenarios. STOW algorithm is an advanced search heuristic employing a diverse range of solution modification strategies, each tailored to address specific aspects of stowage optimization. Feasible solutions were successfully identified for all instances within the benchmark suite. Our initial findings emphasize the importance of accurately modeling lashing forces and employing paired block stowage. Results show that removing the lashing constraint can increase the number of containers stowed by over 7% on average, while disabling paired block stowage can result in nearly a 5% increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Sivertsen, Agnieszka & Reinhardt, Line & Jensen, Rune Møller, 2025. "A representative model and benchmark suite for the container stowage planning problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002650
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002650
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.