IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v201y2025ics1366554525002546.html

Sequential resource allocation for humanitarian operations using approximate dynamic programming

Author

Listed:
  • Fadaki, Masih
  • Ansari, Sina
  • Abareshi, Ahmad
  • Lee, Paul Tae-Woo

Abstract

In humanitarian and nonprofit operations, distributing aid such as food, shelter, and medical supplies becomes challenging in an online setting, where the future demand is unknown, since allocation decisions are made in real time as uncertainties unfold. Being overly conservative in allocating items at the beginning of the supply chain to save stock for fulfilling demand further down the supply chain increases the likelihood of unallocated items (waste). On the other hand, fully addressing the demand of nodes in the earlier stages of the supply chain may negatively impact the equity of the allocation policy, as downstream nodes may receive significantly fewer items in proportion to their demand. This study proposes a framework for modeling the sequential decisions involved in this online resource allocation problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Given that the size of the state–action space can become very large for this problem, standard dynamic programming methods in the reinforcement learning domain reach their limits, so using Approximate Dynamic Programming (ADP) is a practical solution. In this study, two methods of measuring downstream uncertainty are proposed, and Policy Function Approximation (PFA) is used to develop an optimal allocation policy. Numerical results and the application of the proposed model to the Food Bank of Southern Tier in New York suggest a reasonable balance between maximizing efficiency (minimizing the waste of unallocated items) and ensuring an equitable allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Fadaki, Masih & Ansari, Sina & Abareshi, Ahmad & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2025. "Sequential resource allocation for humanitarian operations using approximate dynamic programming," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002546
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002546
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turkcan, Ayten & Zeng, Bo & Muthuraman, Kumar & Lawley, Mark, 2011. "Sequential clinical scheduling with service criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 780-795, November.
    2. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    3. Ohad Eisenhandler & Michal Tzur, 2019. "The Humanitarian Pickup and Distribution Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 10-32, January.
    4. Farhad Hasankhani & Amin Khademi, 2022. "Proportionally fair organ transplantation allocation rules," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 1131-1142, September.
    5. Batta, Rajan & Lejeune, Miguel & Prasad, Srinivas, 2014. "Public facility location using dispersion, population, and equity criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 819-829.
    6. E. Eisenberg, 1961. "Aggregation of Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 337-350, July.
    7. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Bertsimas, Dimitris & Gupta, Shubham & Lulli, Guglielmo, 2014. "Dynamic resource allocation: A flexible and tractable modeling framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 14-26.
    9. Tanzid Hasnain & Irem Sengul Orgut & Julie Simmons Ivy, 2021. "Elicitation of Preference among Multiple Criteria in Food Distribution by Food Banks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4475-4500, December.
    10. Wu, Di & Yin, Yafeng & Lawphongpanich, Siriphong & Yang, Hai, 2012. "Design of more equitable congestion pricing and tradable credit schemes for multimodal transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1273-1287.
    11. Sun, Huali & Li, Jiamei & Wang, Tingsong & Xue, Yaofeng, 2022. "A novel scenario-based robust bi-objective optimization model for humanitarian logistics network under risk of disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Marvin B. Mandell, 1991. "Modelling Effectiveness-Equity Trade-Offs in Public Service Delivery Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 467-482, April.
    14. Burcu Balcik & Seyed Iravani & Karen Smilowitz, 2014. "Multi-vehicle sequential resource allocation for a nonprofit distribution system," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 1279-1297, December.
    15. MohammadHossein Bateni & Yiwei Chen & Dragos Florin Ciocan & Vahab Mirrokni, 2022. "Fair Resource Allocation in a Volatile Marketplace," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 288-308, January.
    16. Chong Hyun Park & Gemma Berenguer, 2020. "Supply Constrained Location‐Distribution in Not‐for‐Profit Settings," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(11), pages 2461-2483, November.
    17. Varian, Hal R., 1976. "Two problems in the theory of fairness," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3-4), pages 249-260.
    18. Alkaabneh, Faisal & Diabat, Ali & Gao, Huaizhu Oliver, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient, effective, and fair resource allocation by food banks using an Approximate Dynamic Programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Md Hafizul Islam & Julie Simmons Ivy, 2022. "Modeling the role of efficiency for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(2), pages 485-534, June.
    20. Jon M. Stauffer & Manoj Vanajakumari & Subodha Kumar & Theresa Mangapora, 2022. "Achieving equitable food security: How can food bank mobile pantries fill this humanitarian need," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1802-1821, April.
    21. Yuanzheng Ma & Tong Wang & Huan Zheng, 2023. "On fairness and efficiency in nonprofit operations: Dynamic resource allocations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1778-1792, June.
    22. Varian, Hal R., 1974. "Equity, envy, and efficiency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 63-91, September.
    23. Fadaki, Masih & Asadikia, Atie, 2024. "Augmenting Monte Carlo Tree Search for managing service level agreements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    24. Masih Fadaki & Babak Abbasi & Prem Chhetri, 2022. "Quantum game approach for capacity allocation decisions under strategic reasoning," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 491-512, July.
    25. Hanan Luss, 1999. "On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 361-378, June.
    26. Sengul Orgut, Irem & Ivy, Julie S. & Uzsoy, Reha & Hale, Charlie, 2018. "Robust optimization approaches for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 516-531.
    27. Butler, Martin & Williams, H. Paul, 2006. "The allocation of shared fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 391-397, April.
    28. Irem Sengul Orgut & Julie Ivy & Reha Uzsoy & James R. Wilson, 2016. "Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food under capacity constraints," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 252-266, March.
    29. Fadaki, Masih & Abareshi, Ahmad & Far, Shaghayegh Maleki & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2022. "Multi-period vaccine allocation model in a pandemic: A case study of COVID-19 in Australia," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    30. Mohammad Firouz & LinDa Li & Barry Cobb & Feibo Shao, 2023. "On the equity-efficiency trade-off in food-bank network operations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(12), pages 2493-2514, December.
    31. Irem Sengul Orgut & Emmett J. Lodree, 2023. "Equitable distribution of perishable items in a food bank supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3002-3021, October.
    32. Fianu, Sefakor & Davis, Lauren B., 2018. "A Markov decision process model for equitable distribution of supplies under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1101-1115.
    33. Jessica H. McCoy & Hau L. Lee, 2014. "Using Fairness Models to Improve Equity in Health Delivery Fleet Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 965-977, June.
    34. Nicolai Abramovich & Alexandru Vasiliu, 2023. "Sustainability as fairness: A Rawlsian framework linking intergenerational equity and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) with business practices," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1328-1342, June.
    35. Marsh, Michael T. & Schilling, David A., 1994. "Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 1-17, April.
    36. Robert W. Lien & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Karen R. Smilowitz, 2014. "Sequential Resource Allocation for Nonprofit Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 301-317, April.
    37. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vivek F. Farias & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2011. "The Price of Fairness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-31, February.
    38. Mohan, S. & Gopalakrishnan, M. & Mizzi, P.J., 2013. "Improving the efficiency of a non-profit supply chain for the food insecure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 248-255.
    39. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Hengliang & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "The efficiency, equity and effectiveness of location strategies in humanitarian logistics: A robust chance-constrained approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    40. Kargar, Bahareh & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Jahani, Hamed & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2020. "Organ transportation and allocation problem under medical uncertainty: A real case study of liver transplantation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    41. Stolletz, Raik & Brunner, Jens O., 2012. "Fair optimization of fortnightly physician schedules with flexible shifts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 622-629.
    42. Lina Yu & Huasheng Yang & Lixin Miao & Canrong Zhang, 2019. "Rollout algorithms for resource allocation in humanitarian logistics," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 887-909, August.
    43. Irem Sengul Orgut & Julie Ivy & Reha Uzsoy, 2017. "Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of food donations under stochastic receiving capacities," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 567-578, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akkerman, Renzo & Buisman, Marjolein & Cruijssen, Frans & de Leeuw, Sander & Haijema, Rene, 2023. "Dealing with donations: Supply chain management challenges for food banks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Jon M. Stauffer & Manoj Vanajakumari & Subodha Kumar & Theresa Mangapora, 2022. "Achieving equitable food security: How can food bank mobile pantries fill this humanitarian need," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1802-1821, April.
    3. Tanzid Hasnain & Irem Sengul Orgut & Julie Simmons Ivy, 2021. "Elicitation of Preference among Multiple Criteria in Food Distribution by Food Banks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4475-4500, December.
    4. Irem Sengul Orgut & Emmett J. Lodree, 2023. "Equitable distribution of perishable items in a food bank supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3002-3021, October.
    5. Mahmoudi, Monirehalsadat & Shirzad, Khadijeh & Verter, Vedat, 2022. "Decision support models for managing food aid supply chains: A systematic literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    6. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    7. Argyris, Nikolaos & Karsu, Özlem & Yavuz, Mirel, 2022. "Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 560-578.
    8. Ohad Eisenhandler & Michal Tzur, 2019. "A Segment-Based Formulation and a Matheuristic for the Humanitarian Pickup and Distribution Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1389-1408, September.
    9. Reusken, Meike & Cruijssen, Frans & Fleuren, Hein, 2023. "A food bank supply chain model: Optimizing investments to maximize food assistance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Md Hafizul Islam & Julie Simmons Ivy, 2022. "Modeling the role of efficiency for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(2), pages 485-534, June.
    11. Suárez, Carlos Aníbal & Guaño, Walter A. & Pérez, Cinthia C. & Roa-López, Heydi, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization for perishable product dispatch in a FEFO system for a food bank single warehouse," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    12. Breugem, Thomas & Fan, Yu & Gernert, Andreas K. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 2025. "Equity in health and humanitarian logistics : A people-centered perspective," Other publications TiSEM 250bcbc6-ec91-4b1d-9f9d-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Yuanzheng Ma & Tong Wang & Huan Zheng, 2023. "On fairness and efficiency in nonprofit operations: Dynamic resource allocations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1778-1792, June.
    14. Esteban Ogazón & Neale R. Smith & Angel Ruiz, 2022. "Reconfiguration of Foodbank Network Logistics to Cope with a Sudden Disaster," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Ohad Eisenhandler & Michal Tzur, 2019. "The Humanitarian Pickup and Distribution Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 10-32, January.
    16. Li, Siping & Zhou, Yaoming, 2024. "Integrating equity and efficiency into urban logistics resilience under emergency lockdowns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    17. Nawazish, Mohammed & Padhi, Sidhartha S., 2025. "Designing integrated relief aid procurement and last-mile distribution strategies for disaster response operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Alkaabneh, Faisal & Diabat, Ali & Gao, Huaizhu Oliver, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient, effective, and fair resource allocation by food banks using an Approximate Dynamic Programming approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    20. Sengul Orgut, Irem & Freeman, Nickolas & Lewis, Dwight & Parton, Jason, 2023. "Equitable and effective vaccine access considering vaccine hesitancy and capacity constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.