Author
Listed:
- Boonpanya, Ornicha
- Mitomo, Hitoshi
- Otsuka, Tokio
Abstract
This study evaluates consumers' valuation of product information provided through the Digital Product Passport (DPP), a policy initiative introduced under the European Union's Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation. The DPP is a digital record, accessible via data carriers such as QR codes, and designed to support the transition toward a circular economy. While regulatory and industry perspectives on the DPP have been widely discussed, the consumer perspective remains underexplored. This study addresses that gap by applying a choice-based conjoint analysis to quantify consumer preferences for key types of information: sourcing, manufacturing/distribution, recycling, and durability. To this end, an online survey was conducted in March 2025 with 1036 Japanese respondents who evaluated products in three sectors: textiles, electronics, and batteries. The results show that consumers incorporate DPP information into product evaluation, while the types of information they value differ across product sectors when making trade-off decisions. In the textile and electronics sectors, positive price coefficients were observed. Several interpretations are possible, including perceived quality and respondents' interpretation of the price levels presented in the survey. In contrast, in the battery sector, the price coefficient was not statistically significant, and interpretation is more limited, as batteries were evaluated in the broader context of EV purchases. Overall, the study highlights the relevance of DPP information for consumers and its potential role in product evaluation.
Suggested Citation
Boonpanya, Ornicha & Mitomo, Hitoshi & Otsuka, Tokio, 2026.
"Consumer evaluation of digital product passport information: Evidence from a conjoint analysis in Japan,"
Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:7:s0308596126000996
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2026.103249
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:7:s0308596126000996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.