Author
Listed:
- Tian, Li
- Wu, Wanyu
- Tan, Ya
- Feng, Shilan
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy has emerged as a key dimension of youth development, with profound implications for education, labor markets, and social equity. Yet, disparities in AI literacy risk amplifying existing inequalities. This study examines gender differences in self-reported AI literacy among Chinese adolescents, conceptualizing self-reported AI literacy as a reflection of self-efficacy. Drawing on Bandura's self-efficacy theory and a developmental-contextual perspective, we construct a multidimensional AI literacy index and employ counterfactual analysis together with Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition to validate and decompose the gender gap. Using a stratified sample of adolescents from diverse backgrounds in China, the study reveals a gender gap in self-reported AI literacy, with males rating themselves higher than females. This gap is heterogeneous across different dimensions of AI literacy and is most pronounced in the dimensions of Understanding, Ethics, and Society. The results further indicate that these differences are attributable both to perception biases and to actual disparities in observed background endowments. The findings highlight the risks of neglecting gendered self-efficacy gaps, which may perpetuate female exclusion from STEM opportunities, and underscore the importance of interventions that strengthen girls' AI self-efficacy. This research makes both theoretical and empirical contributions: it provides insights into the conceptualization and measurement of AI literacy, investigates the connection between AI literacy and self-efficacy, and offers policy-relevant implications for fostering more inclusive and equitable AI education.
Suggested Citation
Tian, Li & Wu, Wanyu & Tan, Ya & Feng, Shilan, 2026.
"Self-reported AI literacy and gendered self-efficacy: Evidence from Chinese adolescents,"
Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:4:s0308596126000029
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2026.103152
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:50:y:2026:i:4:s0308596126000029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.