IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v49y2025i8s0308596125001193.html

Planned obsolescence and smartphone replacement: Empirical evidence on the Italian market

Author

Listed:
  • Corrocher, Nicoletta
  • Paganuzzi, Sara

Abstract

In an era of rapid technological change, planned obsolescence has significantly shaped consumer behaviour, especially in the smartphone industry. This study examines how material, functional, psychological, and economic obsolescence affect smartphone lifespans, using original survey data from Italian consumers. While material remains relevant, its influence diminishes in newer smartphone generations, where software-related limitations and repairability gain prominence. Functional obsolescence is positively associated with device longevity, as many users tolerate performance issues, particularly those with high technological engagement. By contrast, psychological and economic obsolescence remain strong drivers of early replacement. Consumer attitudes interact with different types of obsolescence: users with higher technological engagement are more tolerant of material and functional decline, while pro-repair consumers are less likely to replace devices due to material wear. Furthermore, there is a shift in replacement behaviour over time: for older smartphones, being second-hand significantly shortens lifespan, whereas for newer devices, user behaviour, brand perceptions, and repair attitudes play a more influential role—highlighting a growing consumer awareness around sustainability and functionality. These findings provide insights for both policymakers and manufacturers, highlighting the need for sustainable business practices and robust regulatory frameworks to counteract planned obsolescence and promote longer-lasting products in an environmentally conscious market.

Suggested Citation

  • Corrocher, Nicoletta & Paganuzzi, Sara, 2025. "Planned obsolescence and smartphone replacement: Empirical evidence on the Italian market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:49:y:2025:i:8:s0308596125001193
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596125001193
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole van Nes & Jacqueline Cramer, 2005. "Influencing product lifetime through product design," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 286-299, September.
    2. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    3. Tim Cooper, 2005. "Slower Consumption Reflections on Product Life Spans and the “Throwaway Society”," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(1‐2), pages 51-67, January.
    4. Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort & Stefan Wrzaczek, 2023. "Reputation or warranty, what is more effective against planned obsolescence?," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 939-954, February.
    5. Jeremy Bulow, 1986. "An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 101(4), pages 729-749.
    6. Małgorzata Niklewicz-Pijaczyńska & Elżbieta Stańczyk & Anna Gardocka-Jałowiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Agata Niemczyk & Katarzyna Szalonka & Magdalena Homa, 2021. "A Strategy for Planned Product Aging in View of Sustainable Development Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Jurgita Malinauskaite & Fatih Buğra Erdem, 2021. "Planned Obsolescence in the Context of a Holistic Legal Sphere and the Circular Economy," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 719-749.
    8. Huh, Young Eun & Kim, Sang-Hoon, 2008. "Do early adopters upgrade early? Role of post-adoption behavior in the purchase of next-generation products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 40-46, January.
    9. Joseph Guiltinan, 2009. "Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 19-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renske van den Berge & Lise Magnier & Ruth Mugge, 2023. "Until death do us part? In‐depth insights into Dutch consumers’ considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 908-922, June.
    2. Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Klaus, Phil & Manthiou, Aikaterini & Boujena, Othman, 2019. "Consumer responses to planned obsolescence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 157-165.
    3. Chao, Chih-Wei & Reid, Mike & Mavondo, Felix T., 2012. "Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-217.
    4. Seok Chan Jeong & Beom-Jin Choi, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Consumers’ Personal Innovativeness on the Adoption and Purchase Intention of Wearable Devices," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    5. Kinokuni, Hiroshi & Ohori, Shuichi & Tomoda, Yasunobu, 2021. "Advance disposal fee vs. disposal fee: A monopolistic producer’s durability choice model," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Sabbaghi, Mostafa & Esmaeilian, Behzad & Cade, Willie & Wiens, Kyle & Behdad, Sara, 2016. "Business outcomes of product repairability: A survey-based study of consumer repair experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 114-122.
    7. Guillard, Valérie & Le Nagard, Emmanuelle, 2018. "L'impact de l'obsolescence perçue des biens durables sur la décision de remplacement et la destinée de l'objet remplacé," ESSEC Working Papers WP1801, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    8. Liu, Wumei & Wang, Manxin & He, Jingjing, 2025. "Does faster always mean better? The negative marketing consequences of fast product upgrade frequency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Lea Becker Frahm & Linda Nhu Laursen & Christian Tollestrup, 2022. "Categories and Design Properties of Inherited Long-Lasting Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Derek Ezell & Victoria Bush & Matthew B. Shaner & Scott Vitell & Jiangang Huang, 2023. "Challenging the Good Life: An Institutional Theoretic Investigation of Consumers’ Transformational Process Toward Sustainable Living," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 783-804, March.
    11. Bettiga, Debora & Mandolfo, Marco & Noci, Giuliano, 2025. "Promoting textile product repair services in the European setting: do emotions shape consumers’ evaluations?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    12. Juan Carlos Henao & Daniel Castaño, 2021. "Disrupción tecnológica, transformación digital y sociedad. Tomo III, Derecho, innovación y tecnología: fundamentos para el mundo digital," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1282.
    13. Małgorzata Niklewicz-Pijaczyńska & Elżbieta Stańczyk & Anna Gardocka-Jałowiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Agata Niemczyk & Katarzyna Szalonka & Magdalena Homa, 2021. "A Strategy for Planned Product Aging in View of Sustainable Development Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Peter Byrial Jensen & Louise Møller Haase & Linda Nhu Laursen, 2021. "A Practical Approach to Companies’ Transformation toward Product Longevity: A Best-Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Javier Lloveras & Mario Pansera & Adrian Smith, 2025. "On ‘the Politics of Repair Beyond Repair’: Radical Democracy and the Right to Repair Movement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(2), pages 325-344, January.
    16. Schmidbauer, Eric & Lubensky, Dmitry, 2018. "New and improved?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 26-48.
    17. Kathleen Jacobs & Jacob Hörisch, 2022. "The importance of product lifetime labelling for purchase decisions: Strategic implications for corporate sustainability based on a conjoint analysis in Germany," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1275-1291, May.
    18. Nicolae Istudor & Ionel Dumitru & Alina Filip & Alin Stancu & Mihai Ioan Ro?ca & Andrei Canda, 2023. "Integration of Circular Economy Principles in Consumer Behaviour for Electrical and Electronic Equipment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 1-48, February.
    19. Valérie Guillard & Emmanuelle Le Nagard, 2018. "L'impact de l'obsolescence perçue des biens durables sur la décision de remplacement et la destinée de l'objet remplacé," Working Papers hal-01718752, HAL.
    20. Hiroshi Kinokuni & Shuichi Ohori & Yasunobu Tomoda, 2019. "Optimal Waste Disposal Fees When Product Durability is Endogenous: Accounting for Planned Obsolescence," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(1), pages 33-50, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:49:y:2025:i:8:s0308596125001193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.