IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v27yi3-4p283-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Telecommunications policy learning: the case of the FCC's computer inquiries

Author

Listed:
  • Zarkin, Michael J.

Abstract

During the last fifteen years there has been a growing body of scholarship utilizing social learning theory to explain policy change. While the adaptation of learning theory to the study of policymaking has been an evolutionary process, some core tenets have emerged. Social learning is distinguished from other theories by (1) the importance it places on state actors and (2) its focus on the role of ideas in the policy process. In this essay, social learning theory is applied to several cases of US telecommunications policy-making. More specifically, this paper focuses on the efforts of the Federal Communications Commission to come to grips with the growing technological interdependence between the telephone and computer industries between 1965-86. During this period, three major rule-makings, collectively referred to as the "computer" inquiries, were undertaken by the agency. Following a discussion of social learning theory and a general overview of US telecommunications policy, the three computer inquiries are examined in depth through an analysis of government documents and secondary sources. It is concluded that the historical data presented here confirms a pattern of social learning across the three cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Zarkin, Michael J., 0. "Telecommunications policy learning: the case of the FCC's computer inquiries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3-4), pages 283-299, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:27:y::i:3-4:p:283-299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596102000605
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:27:y::i:3-4:p:283-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.