IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v20yi1p3-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The socio-economic benefits of a universal telephone network: A demand-side view of universal service

Author

Listed:
  • Graham, Stephen
  • Cornford, James
  • Marvin, Simon

Abstract

Universal service has become a major focus of debate within the telecommunications policy community. However, it has been narrowly focused on how universal service might be sustained and developed in the new competitive environment. As such, it has been supply-led, mainly concerned with financial transfers between suppliers to support the costs of providing service to customers or areas deemed 'uneconomic' and the impacts of new technologies upon those transfers. We take a different approach, posing the broader question: what are the social and economic benefits of a truly universal telephone service? We then use this demand-side perspective to readdress the universal policy agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham, Stephen & Cornford, James & Marvin, Simon, 0. "The socio-economic benefits of a universal telephone network: A demand-side view of universal service," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:20:y::i:1:p:3-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308596195000496
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gómez-Barroso, José Luis & Marbán-Flores, Raquel, 2020. "Telecommunications and economic development – The 20th century: The building of an evidence base," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    2. S Speak & S Graham, 1999. "Service not Included: Private Services Restructuring, Neighbourhoods, and Social Marginalisation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(11), pages 1985-2001, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:20:y::i:1:p:3-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.