IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v19yi4p285-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The case against competing infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • Harper, JM

Abstract

The EU Council of Ministers is considering proposals to liberalize telecommunications infrastructure. This article shows that there is no evidence that infrastructure competition in the UK has contributed to improvement in BT's performance. The author argues that the public wants and deserves choice of services and prices at all levels of telecommunications now. It should not have to wait 10 or 20 years while competitors to the old monopolies laboriously construct networks and wrestle with funding problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Harper, JM, 0. "The case against competing infrastructures," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 285-298, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:19:y::i:4:p:285-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030859619500008T
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:19:y::i:4:p:285-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.