IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v19yi1p51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of deregulation: Public participation in the FCC rulemaking process for DBS

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Haeryon

Abstract

This study examines public participation in the deregulation era, with an emphasis on citizen participation, through the rulemaking process for direct broadcast satellite. Its findings suggest that citizens, as groups and as individuals, participated in the policy-making arenas in the formation of deregulatory policy, but with a fraction of the intensity and stamina of the more active participants such as industry interest groups. For those who have a commitment to fostering greater participation by citizens in shaping US communication policy, this study reveals some troubling questions about a course of action in policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Haeryon, 0. "The politics of deregulation: Public participation in the FCC rulemaking process for DBS," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 51-60, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:19:y::i:1:p:51-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030859619400007F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:19:y::i:1:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.