IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v16yi4p307-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anatomy of a failure: picturephone revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Noll, A. Michael

Abstract

Picturephone service -- a two-way, switched, video telephone system -- was developed and marketed by AT&T in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The market did not respond to the service offering, and the service was withdrawn -- in other words, picturephone service was a market failure, although the technology was an impressive success. This article reviews the history of the Bell System's effort to market picturephone service and presents the reasons for its market failure. The results of market research are interweaved with the author's personal experience with visual communications to support the inescapable conclusion that most business customers and residential consumers simply had little need for two-way, face-to-face visual telecommunication. The reasons for the picturephone's market failure had little to do with either technology or cost. Picturephone service simply had little incremental value compared to a telephone call -- and perhaps even negative value for some users.

Suggested Citation

  • Noll, A. Michael, 0. "Anatomy of a failure: picturephone revisited," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 307-316, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:16:y::i:4:p:307-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030859619290039R
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:16:y::i:4:p:307-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.